My Personal Annual Report for 2008

Posted on January 6th, 2009 in personal | No Comments »

2008 was a very big year for me - I accomplished many things that I am most proud of. So, at the end of the year, I felt it was particularly important to revisit the ups and downs of the year, beyond just the traditional yearly roundup list that I’ve done since 2006. 

Last year around this time, I discovered Nicholas Feltron’s Personal Annual Report. It in, and I’m not quite sure how, he detailed the restaurants he’d eaten at, how many pages he read, how many movies he had seen, and onwards. I’ve always been quite interested in data visualization, so I naturally had a feast on this report done by Feltron, a graphic designer. His work inspired me to do some data collection of my own life, starting quite in depth this year, with information such as sleep lengths, daily morale, daily health, daily steps, etc.

Although I haven’t been tracking such stuff until recently, I did, however, have a number of semi-automated data collection streams running through most of the year. I decided to collect it all up and have displayed this data in various visual formats that I found interesting. It is all pieced together in The Hillsdon Report for 2008

In it I track:

  • Computer usage
  • Web history
  • Blogging stats
  • Facebook status updates
  • Travel stats
  • Music stats
  • Movie stats
  • Bookmarks
  • Video stats
  • Photo stats
  • RSS stats
  • Money stats

So, if you are compelled, do check it out. You can download it from this link or view it online at Scribd.

Sphere: Related Content

Dead or alive (the coalition)?

Posted on December 5th, 2008 in canada, politics, rants, society | 1 Comment »

I haven’t blogged about this whole affair simply because so much was happening, and changing, each and every single day. It seems, now that Parliament is prorogued, that the whole conversation will now shift and reorganize - to what I don’t know, and that will depend on whether the opposition parties decide to forge forward in an election-like campaign for a coalition government.

Public opinion doesn’t seem to be in their favour however. Harper’s lies and divisiveness in the past few days has done nothing less than completely disgust hundreds of thousands of Canadians - actions that are quite literally fanning the flames of national unity for the sake of short term personal and political gain. However, in doing so, he’s been extremely successful in rallying his base and many other Canadians with lies and incendiary language such as “traitors”, “separatists”, and “coup d’état”. Typical Republican crap that pits us versus them. 

The silent majority finally stood up and said enough was enough. You may question progressive policies, you may play politics in the House of Commons, you may slowly remove the rights and institutions that make Canada what it is, but when you begin questioning our patriotism for this country, then god dammit you asshole, you’ve stepped way too far. It’s utterly repulsive and it’s unlikely that such division can be repaired anytime soon. 

Rumour is that the Libs want to pull out of the coalition. We will see if that is true in the days ahead. I truly hope not, simply out of the fact that if the coalition falls apart, Harper will gain a majority next election - if things continue the way they are going. 

If the coalition continues however, and my fingers are crossed that it does, here’s what coalition supporters need to do. 

1. Organize

The Conservative machine is in full swing and boy, their base is like sheep! They are easy to range up, and regurgitate the talking points like programmed robots. The Conservatives have the money and the energy to put out the nastiest PR campaign ever. 

We need to get our things together! Right now, there’s three organizations, not including the three opposition parties, that are trying to rally supporters - Make Parliament Work, 62% Majority, and Canadians for a Progressive Coalition. They need to coordinate and work together to make sure that there’s no crossover and that people can get the required info from either one single source, or the same info from all three sources. 

2. Rally the base

We are all human and all emit strong response when emotions are in play. The Tories play this way, and so should we, but only with our base - which is quite broad all things considered! 

I am disturbed when I hear Stephen Harper calling Quebeckers separatists. I am provoked when he claims “Western Canada” will not stand for a coalition. I am royally pissed when I think of the all the years he’s been in our government with the sole purpose of gaining power and destroying the Liberals. It’s all a game to him.

The base needs to be reminded of this and reminded directly by Stephen Harper himself. Rallies should be playing interviews or quotes from our PM. We need to get riled up. This in an extremely exciting, and dangerous, time in our country’s history. Stephen Harper must go - that’s the message the base needs in their head 24/7. 

3. Give ‘em Hope

And for all the hundreds of thousands who don’t care about politics, who are completely turned off by what’s going on in Ottawa, we gotta give ‘em hope. 

People don’t know what’s been offered by the coalition. They haven’t head of the economic stimulus package, with support for the auto, manufacturing, and forestry sector. They haven’t heard of the billion dollars in infrastructure for transit, gateways, water and clean energy. They haven’t heard of the restoration of funding cuts from the arts and culture, nor of the pension, EI, and RIFF changes to support workers and seniors during this economic crisis. They haven’t heard about the introduction of a housing retrofit program, nor the North American cap and trade emissions trading system, not to mention the restoration of the national child care and early learning program, and the Kelowna Accord. 

If I learned anything during my run for city council, it’s that people want to know you are offering them a better tomorrow, that your plans are realistic, and that your actions are bold and swift. The coalition’s policy accord is all three of theses things, and when compared to what the Conservatives have accomplished in government for the past two years, it really makes you question how the hell Stephen Harper’s made your own life better. 

There’s action for workers, seniors, families, children, and the First Nations. There’s action on climate change, the energy crisis, arts & culture cuts, social security, and immigration. 

Hearing their plans is enough to spoil the average Canadian who, in the past two years, got a couple cents off their purchases everyday, while housing and gas prices skyrocketed, nothing was done about climate change, nothing was done to address the current economic crisis, nothing was done to solve homelessness or gang warfare or our First Nations or the child care gap or our crumbling infrastructure. 

If we communicate this message of hope for a better tomorrow, then I truly believe Canadians will come together behind this coalition and, like our counterparts down south, start chanting, in non-partisan unison, Yes We Can. 

4. Get’er done!

There’s seven weeks till the House resumes. If the opposition parties stand behind this coalition, here’s what I propose. 

Each and every weekend, we need to hold a rally, in cities across Canada, and these need to grow in size each time. We need to take over public squares, parks, City Hall steps, MPs’ offices, and even the streets. 

 We need to ensure that we pull support from each and every corner - students, seniors, families, unions, workers, transit riders, religious groups, immigrants, glbt, aboriginals, etc. We need to ensure the speeches are inspirational. We need to ensure programming gets better and better with each rally. We need catchy chants that we can shout out at the top of our lungs. 

It needs to be a movement. There needs to be momentum. 

Continue to push the message throughout the week on talk radio, facebook, polls, and by flooding the papers with letters to the editor. Mobilize the troops. Give supporters a reason and a means. 

Show the Conservatives and their base that the progressives in this country will not stand idly by while Canada burns from coast to coast to coast because of the greed of Stephen Harper.

Sphere: Related Content

Coalition government coming?

Posted on November 27th, 2008 in canada, politics, society, youtube | No Comments »

Seems like a prime opportunity for Jack Layton to realize his high school dream of one day being Prime Minister - I mean, surely, outgoing Dion would not be suitable, nor would he want, to lead a coalition of the Liberals and NDP. Interesting days ahead for sure.

Sphere: Related Content

Video of the Golden Ears Bridge

Posted on November 25th, 2008 in technology, transportation, vancouver, youtube | 1 Comment »

I’m looking for a job!

Posted on November 19th, 2008 in personal | No Comments »

Trust me, this blog isn’t normally about personal stuff, but since I lost the election, I’m now looking for a job! If you have any connections or know of any good positions available, please contact me, or forward my information to said business person. I’d really appreciate it! You can download my resume here.

Sphere: Related Content

Hate mail from “Jason Krog”

Posted on November 18th, 2008 in politics, rants, society, surrey | 17 Comments »

This just hit my facebook. What do you think I should do?

ur fuking 18 u faggot. stop…dear god just stop…What the hell is the world coming to when an 18 year old that is still a virgin is trying to be part of city council. This is not an episode of the simpsons or family guy where anything can happen. You have barely finished a semester of post secondary, have no fucking life experience, barely got your lisence, still can’t conversate properly as I can see in your tv interviews, how the fuck do you expect to sit on a council with a bunch of experienced men and woman and deal with the problems of surrey residents? The people that voted for you are just as dumb as you are. Hell even a 30 year old is young for something like this..me and my friends were talking and we think you’re making a mockery of the system where a bunch of 18 year old retards are trying to land important government jobs…you ugly faggot, get a post secondary degree, get married, have kids, GROW UP A LITTLE before you try and pull this shit again. i swear if you ever accidently run into me campagning handing out ads I will punch you square in the face if you’re still under the age of 30…bye

UPDATE: Jason Krog is apparently a Vancouver Canuck. This was obviously a fake identity. Easy enough to do - I’ve created a Paul Simon account on facebook before!

Sphere: Related Content

Surrey council campaign!

Posted on November 10th, 2008 in Uncategorized | 4 Comments »

If you’ve come here looking for info on my run for council, please visit my campaign website at paulin08.com. There’s a full platform over there. 

This site has always been a personal venting area for me. And let me just say what a wild ride this whole campaign has been. I’m extremely excited with the response I’ve been getting, and am delighted that I was able to really put light rail on the table for Surrey. It’s something we need to do, and we need political leadership to accomplish it. 

I don’t want to start writing my memoirs before the campaign is done, but whatever happens, I’ve certainly learned a lot, made a ton of connections, and feel proud of the campaign I’ve run. 

At this point, here’s my prediction. One of three things will happen. I’ll either:

  • Win at the lower scale
  • Just barely lose, but get a very strong turnout
  • Lose horribly

I’m very passionate about transforming Surrey into a major city on the national stage with clout, pride, and a new face to show the world - a leader in sustainability, cultural diversity, and community participation.

I’m prepared to do everything possible to make this vision a reality and my goal, at the end of a three year term on council, would be nothing short of having a light rail system under construction, the greenways network completed, and a vibrant bustling City Centre bursting with sustainable development. 

Vote Paul Hillsdon. Saturday November 15th.

Sphere: Related Content

Breaking down the data - Surrey candidates on highways and sprawl

Posted on October 31st, 2008 in environment, politics, rants, surrey, transportation | 8 Comments »

In case you didn’t know, The Vancouver Sun has invited all the civic candidates from across BC to fill out an online survey with their opinions on a number of issues. I have recently been questioned over my position on Gateway - I am neutral.

You have a choice of choosing, on all issues:

  • Strongly agree
  • Agree
  • Neutral
  • Disagree
  • Strongly Disagree

The reason I am neutral on Gateway is because it’s coming whether we want it or not. It’s just another case of the Eagle Ridge bluffs. If we build highways without other viable transport options, we are going to encourage more car usage and urban sprawl. If we build highways, in addition to other viable transport options, we can manage transport demand efficiently, and encourage densification rather than sprawl.

Ultimately, though, what you want to do, is prioritize all other methods of transport over the car, and with such a hierarchy in place, Gateway should not be happening. All the money should be spent on transit, HOT lanes, safe cycling routes - and only built if we still have the same problems afterwards.

However, as I said, it’s coming, and it’s quite late in the game to try and stop it. While I may have been in favour of that before, I’ve moved forward. While cancelling Gateway would’ve given us money for transit, we don’t need to do one or the other because the Province has also given us money for SkyTrain expansion. 

I will continue to fight to redirect that $1.1 billion for a 6 km SkyTrain extension towards a 43 km light rail network across Surrey and Langley. If we were to do so, Gateway’s impacts should be minimal, and we will begin to have the infrastructure in place to offer a real viable green commuting alternative to people, in addition to providing the incentive to revitalize and densify our town centres.

There’s several other interesting points I’d like to deduce from the data of the survey over the connection between the Port Mann twin and urban sprawl.

As I mentioned before, if the candidate believes that Surrey is “plagued by urban sprawl”, then they should most likely disagree with the “twinning of the Port Mann”. Like this:

So, here’s the actual data:

It’s interesting to see some of the candidates positions on this issue. Here’s some things that stood out for me.

1. Bloc voting. 

Only two of the Surrey First candidates have given a different position than the Mayor. Now not to attack these candidates, and maybe that just is their position on the matter, but Tom Gill, Linda Hepner, Mary Martin, and Barbara Steele all answered the exact same way. Personally, it comes across very much as if they have no individuality and are just rubber stamping whatever the Mayor puts forward.

Only Judy Villeneuve and Barinder Rasode, both formerly of the SCC, give separate, more progressive answers on the matter.

2. Sprawl issue

Frankly, I really don’t see how anyone can say that Surrey is not “plagued by sprawl”. What is Grandview Heights? What is Campbell Heights? Rosemary Heights? Sullivan? West Newton? Clayton? Fraser Heights?

This is all development that overtakes old vast acres of either exurban or rural land. That is sprawl.

Only Marvin Hunt “strongly disagreed” with the notion that Surrey is “plagued by urban sprawl”.

Those who are either neutral, agree or strongly agree that Surrey is “plagued by urban sprawl” - 10 candidates.:

  • Bob Bose
  • Rina Gill
  • Paul Hillsdon
  • Bernadette Keenan
  • Jim McMurtry
  • Barinder Rasode
  • Grant Ride
  • Gary Robinson
  • Stephanie Ryan
  • Judy Villeneuve

3. Port Mann twin

Now I understand it isn’t a black and white issue, but I would say that to be progressive on the Port Mann issue, you’d either have to be neutral, disagree, or strongly disagree. 5 candidates did so:

  • Rina Gill
  • Paul Hillsdon
  • Bernadette Keenan
  • Jim McMurtry
  • Grant Rice

4. Best case scenario

As I mentioned before, is highway expansion goes completely in line with urban sprawl, then the best case scenario would be a “strongly disagree” with the Port Mann twin, and a “strongly agree” with the urban sprawl issue. Unless of course we want to be Phoenix Arizona. 

Surprisingly, no one answered that way. To me that says the issue isn’t as clear cut as some would like to make it. 
Bernadette Keenan got closest to the right answer, but she only answered “agree” on the urban sprawl isssue.

5. The oddball Robinson factor
The one answer that stood out finally was Gary Robinson’s responses. 

He said that he “strongly agrees” that we are plagued by urban sprawl, and yet he also “strongly agrees” with the twinning of the Port Mann bridge. 

In my opinion, someone should be grilling him on that, rather than me for being neutral on Gateway.

Sphere: Related Content

Council candidate profiles: resume or vision?

Posted on October 20th, 2008 in politics, rants, society, surrey | 1 Comment »

The candidate profiles finally went up on the City of Surrey’s website the other day.

First off, it’s a great thing to have. I can’t imagine what residents did without such a central info stop for the election. I think it will help balance the playing field among candidates and will increase the name awareness of all candidates. 

Now, it’s interesting to read what candidates have chosen to write. There seems to be two different groups:

  • The resume profile
  • The vision profile

Those in the resume profile tend to be incumbents or of an older generation. They write about all the committees they been a part of. That may seem to give them the look of experience, but it makes me wonder, (1) if you’ve been doing all this great stuff outside of council, why is such and such still an issue?, and (2) why aren’t you telling me what you want to accomplish on council?

No names committees don’t matter to me. If you were the CEO of Tim Hortons or something, it might be worth mentioning, but anything less and it’s useless to me and my decision of whether to vote for you!

The vision profile I find much more attractive.  Naturally, it’s what I chose to write for my two profiles. In the vision profile, you focus primarily on why you are running, and what improvements or projects you’d pursue in that position of power. Of the 20 candidates for council and 15 candidates for school trustee, only 9 of the two combined wrote a vision profile!

So I’m curious. Which would you rather read?
n

Which type of candidate profile is more effective in luring your vote?
View Results
Sphere: Related Content

Go out and VOTE!

Posted on October 14th, 2008 in canada, politics, society | 1 Comment »

7 am - 7 pm

Visit Elections Canada for the location of your polling station

Bring one piece of government issued photo ID

Sphere: Related Content